In a nationalized wellness care technique, you need to have to know who is who – otherwise the technique could never be in a position figure out who is entitled. The structure depends on how the program is made and developed, but with a nationalized well being care method you will be tracked by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in America. The nationalized health care system becomes a car for population control.
If you leave the United States and are no longer a resident of the state, even if you are a citizen and may possibly preserve a driving license, you will have to report quickly if you want to steer clear of the 13% well being care tax. I use the number 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax stress that is laid upon you for the nationalized well being care.
Let’s say you moved and you do not want to spend the 13% tax for solutions you do not get, can get, or want to taken out from the tax roll. ENT Doctor London has no interest to let you go so effortless. You will finish up having to reveal your private life – companion, dwellings, travel, funds, and job to prove your case that you have the appropriate to leave the public well being care program and do not require to spend the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your information and facts could be a element of administrative court documents that are open and public documents. As quickly as you return to the United States, you will be automatically enrolled again and the taxes commence to pile up.
Public universal wellness care has no interest in defending your privacy. They want their tax funds and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the needs to not be taxable. In that method, your private life is up for display.
The national ID-card and national population registry that contains your medical data is a foundation of the nationalized wellness care system. You can see where this is going – population handle and capability to use the law and wellness care access to map your complete private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks exactly where you live, who you reside with, when you move and your citizen status such as residency the Swedes can separate who can receive universal well being care from these not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social safety quantity, with the tap of the keyboard, more data about yourself than you can recall. The Swedish government has taken sharing of data in between agencies to a new level. The cause is very straightforward – to collect health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can adjust the registered data in the data. So if you want to modify your name, even the slightest change, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry makes it achievable to ascertain who is who under all circumstances and it is required for the national wellness care technique. Otherwise, any individual could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States demands a completely new doctrine for population registry and handle. In an American context that would require that just about every existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied below stricter identification guidelines that would match not only data from Internal Income Service, state government, municipal government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but virtually any agency that delivers services to the general public. The cause why a new population registry would be needed in the United States is the truth that lax guidelines dating back to the 1940s up until the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has created a substantial percentage of private facts about men and women questionable.
If America as an alternative neglects keeping safe records, figuring out eligibility for public wellness care would not be possible and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the method would prevail. This would ultimately bring down the method.
It is financially not possible to develop a universal overall health care program without clearly recognizing who is entitled and not. The technique requires to have limits of its entitlement. A social security number would not be sufficient as these numbers have been handed out by means of decades to temporary residents that might not even live in the United States or might now be out of status as illegal immigrants.
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.